journalists@risk™ is an online community of media professionals with experience of work in hostile environments, including war zones
journalists@risk :: Navigation
journalists@risk™ is an online community of media professionals with experience of work in hostile environments, including war zones. You are welcome to browse the entire website and check out the KnowledgeBase, Safety Tips, and other online resources by clicking on the corresponding links of the site's navigation panel, left.
KnowledgeBase
Safety Tips


Assignments to war and other danger zones must be voluntary and only involve experienced news gatherers and those under their direct supervision. No career should suffer as a result of refusing a dangerous assignment. The judgement of the journalist on the spot should be final when assessing the danger or otherwise of a situation.
Journalists in dangerous situations must constantly re-evaluate risks and know when to back down.

As Terry Anderson, CPJ honorary co-chairman and former Associated Press Beirut bureau chief, who was held hostage for nearly seven years in Lebanon, has said: "Always, constantly, constantly, every minute, weigh the benefits against the risks. And as soon as you come to the point where you feel uncomfortable with that equation, get out, go, leave it. It's not worth it. There is no story worth getting killed for."

» On Assignment: Covering Conflicts Safely by the Committee to Protect Journalists

» No links at the moment, please try again later.

Linkster

» Online Resources :: Categories :: Web Links


journalists@risk
» CONTENTS
» Signs of a Potential Terrorist Attack
» The War in Iraq: The psychological consequences for journalists
» Safety First - INSI
» Principles of Protection from Terrorism
» Kidnappings in Iraq - Lessons to be Drawn
» How to Handle Ambushes and Road Blocks
» Dangerous Assignments
» PTSD in Journalists
» Tips on War Reporting
» Indirect Trauma
» Self-Care and Self-Help Following Disasters
» The Nature of Trauma
» MORE

The War in Iraq: The psychological consequences for journalists

Posted on: Mon, June 06 2005 - 2:00 pm

The War in Iraq: The psychological consequences for journalists

By Anthony Feinstein
Professor, Department of Psychiatry
University of Toronto

The statistics tell a powerful story. Eighteen journalists dead in Iraq and the war has yet to end. Sadly, there is nothing new in this for it has long been accepted that war journalism is a dangerous profession. What has changed, perhaps, is the understanding that the profession can no longer simply measure the cost to toting up the obituaries. The dangers of war are often insidious and far reaching. Data recently published in the American Journal of Psychiatry revealed that front line journalists who returned repeatedly to areas of grave physical danger were at risk for a host of emotional problems, ranging from clinical significant depression to a syndrome termed posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Furthermore, a second relevant observation was that a subgroup of journalists resorted to drinking heavily, often as a means of dealing with their psychological distress.

The above findings were derived from an experienced group of journalists who had spent many years in the Balkan conflicts in addition to covering wars in Rwanda, the Congo, Sierra Leone, Chechnya, Afghanistan and a miscellany of other hellish trouble spots. The question that needed answering was whether the psychological conclusions derived from these earlier conflicts could be extrapolated to the current war in Iraq? And in particular, with the emergence of the ‘embedded journalist’ phenomenon, were journalists now at an increased or reduced risk of developing depression and PTSD.

To that end, with the help of CNN and ITN, a study was undertaken of 100 journalists who had covered the opening phases of the Iraq war. All data were collected by the middle of July 2003 which coincided with the end of conventional warfare. The first observation, as with an earlier study, was that the response rate was excellent, namely 88%. Of these three quarters were men. The average age of the journalists was in the late thirties. To summarise the psychological findings: roughly 20% of the sample endorsed significant symptoms of depression (low mood, tearfulness, difficulties with sleep, appetite and sexual drive, a sense of failure and guilt) while a similar percentage were troubled by an array of PTSD type symptoms (nightmares, recurrent unwanted thoughts of episodes in which they had come close to dying or seeing someone die, flashbacks, an emotional numbing, a hypervigilance even when away from danger, a prominent startle response and so on). Of note was that these percentages were lower than those gathered from earlier conflicts. This introduced a paradox, given the high death rate amongst the journalists. However, a closer look at how the journalists died revealed that motor vehicle accidents and natural causes took a toll. So too did friendly fire (an appalling oxymoron) incidents. Thus, an important finding from the opening phase of the war was that, in relation to earlier conflicts, most notably Bosnia and Chechnya, journalists felt in less danger. And this translated in turn into less depressive and PTSD symptoms.

Could this have been the results of journalists embedding with the military? The answer was an unequivocal no. Approximately half the sample were embedded journalists and their exposure to life threatening events, which occurred on average three times before mid-July, did not differ from the unilateral or independent journalists. It therefore came as no surprise that the two groups of journalists, given their similar exposure to danger, had virtually identical symptom profiles. Here one should pause for a moment and reflect on just how dangerous the job is and how this group perceive danger. On average, journalists came close to getting killed once a week during the three week period the data were collected (the range was zero to ten near fatal incidents). And yet they still rated this period less hazardous than earlier conflicts.

What is one to make of all of this? On the plus side it is encouraging that organisations like CNN, ITN and others are taking this issue of the ‘psychological well-being’ of their journalists seriously. Because in time, data such as these will lead to a greater awareness that physical health is inextricably linked to emotional health. And this will ensure, hopefully, that those in need receive the necessary care. On the negative side, the fact that depression and PTSD scores were lower in Iraq should not induce a false sense of comfort. The decrease was relative and in absolute numbers, the percentages remain high. It is also important to remember these figures pre-date the insurgency war, which has pushed Iraq towards the type of conflict journalists rate the most dangerous of all. Repeating the data collection closer to July when coalition forces are due to begin pulling out of Iraq should be informative and complement what has been learned already.

In the final analysis, all the data collection and statistical analyses will amount to very little if the news organisations ignore the findings. Increasing awareness is important. Providing treatment is essential.

http://www.newssafety.com/safety/documents/feinstein.doc

This article has been viewed 7099 times

» List All Articles in the Archives


SAS Survival Handbook: How to Survive in the Wild, in Any Climate, on Land or at Sea
SAS Survival Handbook: How to Survive in the Wild, in Any Climate, on Land or at Sea


War Torn: Stories of War from the Women Reporters who Covered Vietnam
War Torn: Stories of War from the Women Reporters who Covered Vietnam


War Is a Force that Gives Us 

Meaning
War Is a Force that Gives Us Meaning


Means Of Escape: A War Correspondents Memoir of Life and Death in Afghanistan, the 

Middle East, and Vietnam
Means Of Escape: A War Correspondents Memoir of Life and Death in Afghanistan, the Middle East, and Vietnam


The Modern Bodyguard : The Manual of Close Protection Training
The Modern Bodyguard : The Manual of Close Protection Training

journalists@risk :: Navigation
Home · Archives · Safety Tips · Credits · Top
Ad Page


Copyright © 2004-2010 newsbee™ All Rights Reserved

Legal Disclaimer: The information provided on this site is not guaranteed to be error-free or to serve a specific purpose, and its use is entirely at the user's risk. To the extent permitted by law, journalists@risk™ and other posters/authors shall not be liable for any loss, injury, damage, claim, or expenses resulting from any use of such information
Copyright Notice: The site contains copyrighted material under Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law, which provides for the fair use of copyrighted works for non-profit educational purposes, covering "criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research." If visitors wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes going beyond fair use, they must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Copyright regulations, including fair use provisions, may differ from country to country. Any organization or personal Web site can provide links to and frames of this site, but journalists@risk™ requires that the links are clearly acknowledged and requests that its pages are not framed by advertising. Links and frames connecting this site with other sites are for convenience only and do not mean that journalists@risk™ endorses or approves those other sites, their content, or the people who run them
Privacy Policy: No personal information is collected from visitors to this site